The former referee Graziano Cesari intervened on the frequencies of Radio you are to analyze the situations of the match officials: “I think that football is a contact sport, especially when a referee has the possibility of seeing well from a short distance, a better condition to also judge the extent of the contact – highlights Lalaziosiamonoi.it -. So why does VAR need to intervene? In my opinion the goal should not be cancelled, the pitch’s decision should have been legitimised. Paterna really shouldn’t have intervened at VAR because that isn’t a clear and obvious mistake. There was no reason to change the decision, completion out of place. There is never a penalty on Zaccagni, I wouldn’t want Zufferli to have been influenced by the previous situation that penalized Lazio. This would demonstrate the conditioning of the VAR on the match director and on the match.
This is about having very specific tasks that must be respected. The on-field referee must judge and make decisions. Then, in case of gross errors, the VAR assistant must intervene to correct the mistake. The regulation is changing and adapting to behavior on the pitch and protests. Quite the opposite with the initial assumptions of the regulation. A refereeing category dies when the coach says after the match that he absolutely doesn’t want to talk about the referee.
Baroni case after Parma. Lazio-Ludogorets? Better not to talk, I’ll do like Baroni (laughs, ed.). The referee was a tortoise, let’s put it that way. Pairetto for Lazio-Napoli? He has a fluctuating behavior, you never know if his evening is right or wrong. Never continuous, if the race gets a little tougher he can’t change gear often.”