The news of the possible creation of a government agency to control the accounts of football teams has created a great debate in our football. Malagò “Autonomy of sport violated 100%: if it is believed that different things should be done to improve correctly, but different times had to be found. And in reality it could concern all sports. But it was managed badly, we at CONI were not informed , times and ways are wrong. We are all disconcerted: Abodi managed to get Gravina and Lotito to agree for once, he will go down in history…. I think that any reasoning, even valid, automatically takes the wrong path that nothing was known about it at CONI. And that we learned about it from the federation and the press. We deserve respect and this is an indication of the fact that the conditions are not good.”
These are the words of Franco Carraro. “The aim was not to check that the clubs’ budgets were balanced, but rather to guarantee the system that the teams that started the championship could finish it. And I believe that the objective was achieved. Abodi? You know football well, the government has the interest that sport is orderly and from this point of view it can certainly be improved. But it is unacceptable to expect the management of football and basketball to depend on the government. Furthermore, FIFA and UEFA will expect the federations to function democratically must follow the international model”.
Gravina instead defends Covisoc. “What is happening in these hours with this activity, this agency, I consider “something” perhaps disrespectful towards three magistrates who are part of the current organization of Covisoc, extraordinary professionals, super partes, then we suddenly realize that from today Covisoc is no longer independent when Covisoc historically, history says it and I say it too, has a function assigned by law to ensure that a club starts and reaches the end of the championship”.